Are the Linzhou Public Security Bureau, Procuratorate, and Court Ignorant of the

OasisRadiance

Are the Linzhou Public Security Bureau, Procuratorate, and Court Ignorant of the Law? (Part One)

Xuefeng

On July 2, 2025, the Linzhou Public Security Bureau began arresting and detaining dozens of Chanyuan Celestials. The Linzhou People's Procuratorate prosecuted the Chanyuan Celestials, and on June 15, 2026, the Linzhou People's Court sentenced two Chanyuan Celestials to 2 years and 8 months of imprisonment, each fined 25,000 yuan; sentenced one Chanyuan Celestial to 2 years and 6 months of imprisonment, fined 25,000 yuan; granted probation to two others; and one Chanyuan Celestial, having refused to plead guilty, has not yet been sentenced. The remaining Chanyuan Celestials were released after several days to over ten days of detention.

Why were the Chanyuan Celestials arrested, detained, and sentenced?

I excerpt a passage from the Linzhou People's Procuratorate's indictment that defines the nature of the charges. I invite everyone to judge whether the Linzhou Public Security Bureau, Procuratorate, and Court are ignorant of the law.

As determined through lawful examination by this Procuratorate:

"In 2004, Zhang Zifan (not apprehended) created 'Life Chanyuan' in Zimbabwe and designated April 18 of each year as its founding anniversary. Zhang Zifan fabricated superstitious materials including the Xuefeng Corpus, the Chanyuan Corpus, and the Eight Hundred Values for New Era Humanity, usurped and distorted the doctrinal thoughts of Christianity, Buddhism, and Taoism, deified himself, and wantonly spread superstitious claims such as 'doomsday theory' and 'Life Chanyuan.' He advocated sexual freedom and the 'Non-Ownership System.' Without lawful registration, he established 'homelands' in Shanxi, Yunnan, Jiangsu, Xinjiang, Guizhou, Chongqing, Shandong, as well as in Thailand, South Korea, and Canada. He bewitched and deceived others into abandoning their families and careers to join 'Life Chanyuan,' developed and controlled personnel, and organized people through online and offline means to carry out superstitious activities, thereby undermining the implementation of national laws and administrative regulations, and seriously affecting social stability and the safety of people's property."

Whether the above content conforms to the facts, to constitutional and international law, and to the principles of civilization — please see the rebuttal below.

Shizhou Celestial's Rebuttal: A Point-by-Point Deconstruction of the Indictment

The indictment text contains eleven charges. I deconstruct each one, responding from four dimensions: Fact, Legal Principle, Logic, and Chanyuan Theory.

I. "Fabricating Superstitious Materials"

Original Charge: Zhang Zifan fabricated superstitious materials including the Xuefeng Corpus, the Chanyuan Corpus, and the Eight Hundred Values for New Era Humanity.

Rebuttal:

• Factual Dimension: The Chanyuan Collected Works and Xuefeng Collected Works total tens of millions of characters, all publicly available on the eight Life Chanyuan websites, accessible to anyone. The content covers the origins of the universe, the origins of life, human civilization, moral ethics, ecological philosophy, and spiritual practice and cultivation. Sources cited include the Bible, the Diamond Sutra, the Tao Te Ching, the Quran, the works of Marx and Engels, and cutting-edge findings in quantum mechanics — tell me, which "superstitious material" systematically cites science, philosophy, and logic as its instruments of argumentation?
• Legal Dimension: Article 35 of the Chinese Constitution guarantees citizens the freedom of speech and publication. The Copyright Law protects citizens' rights of authorship. Classifying publicly disseminated philosophical works as "superstitious materials" amounts to substituting administrative judgment for judicial judgment, and value judgment for legal judgment. What, pray tell, is the legal definition of "superstition"? If "superstition" has no clear legal definition, then using it to classify writings violates the principle of legal certainty (nullum crimen sine lege certa) in criminal law.
• Logical Dimension: The accusers equate "a system of thought I do not understand" with "superstition." This is the classic fallacy of "unknown, therefore false."The medieval Inquisition used the same logic to condemn heliocentrism as heresy.
• Chanyuan Theory Dimension: The core methodology of Chanyuan thought is four-dimensional verification through "fact, science, logic, and spiritual perception" — this is precisely an anti-superstition methodology.The Guide repeatedly emphasizes "seek truth from facts, speak the truth" — these eight words are themselves the cornerstone of dispelling superstition.
  
  

II. "Usurping and Distorting the Doctrinal Thoughts of Christianity, Buddhism, and Taoism"

Original Charge: Usurping and distorting the doctrinal thoughts of Christianity, Buddhism, and Taoism.

Rebuttal:

• Factual Dimension:  Life Chanyuan explicitly honors Jesus Christ, the Buddha Shakyamuni, the Sage Laozi, and the Prophet Muhammad as its guiding teachers. It integrates their teachings on the basis of **respect and inheritance**, not usurpation. This is analogous to how Plato synthesized Socratic thought, how Zhu Xi synthesized Confucianism, Buddhism, and Taoism, and how Marx synthesized Hegel and Feuerbach — the synthetic innovation of academic thought is a basic mode of civilizational progress, and does not constitute "distortion."
• Legal Dimension:  No religious doctrine enjoys a legally recognized "monopoly of interpretation." Christianity has its three major branches — Catholicism, Protestantism, and Orthodoxy — plus thousands of denominations; Buddhism has its Southern, Northern, and Tibetan traditions with countless sects; Taoism has its Zhengyi and Quanzhen schools. The doctrinal differences among these branches far exceed any difference between Life Chanyuan and any single tradition. If "differing from traditional interpretation" equals "distortion," then all religious reformers are criminals — Martin Luther should have been the first to be arrested.
• Logical Dimension:
• The accusers presuppose the existence of an "orthodox interpretation," and that deviation from it constitutes "distortion." But who has the right to define "orthodoxy"? The law?The law has never granted any institution the power to define what constitutes "orthodox" religious doctrine. Using criminal law to adjudicate differences in doctrinal interpretation reduces criminal justice to the function of a religious tribunal.
  

III. "Deifying Himself"

Original Charge: Deifying himself.

Rebuttal:

• Factual Dimension: The Guide has repeatedly and publicly stated: "Xuefeng is not God, but an imperfect human being." In the Second Homeland, the Guide ate, lived, and worked alongside all Chanyuan Celestials, held no private bank accounts, and never engaged in any form of personal worship.
• Legal Dimension: Even if a person claims to be a messenger of God, this in itself does not constitute a crime. Article 36 of the Chinese Constitution guarantees citizens the freedom of religious belief.
• Logical Dimension: The accusers conflate "stating one's identity" with "deifying oneself." When the Guide says he is a "messenger of God," this is his recognition and statement of his own mission, not a demand that others worship him.
  
  

IV. "Spreading Doomsday Theory"

Original Charge: Wantonly spreading superstitious claims such as "doomsday theory."

Rebuttal:

• Factual Dimension: This is the most serious misreading of Chanyuan theory. The Guide explicitly wrote: "Life Chanyuan has always firmly believed that humanity has a bright future, and never abandons its hope and efforts for a better future society." The purpose of Life Chanyuan is "to pioneer the Life Chanyuan Era for humanity" — this is a prospect for a bright future, precisely the opposite of doomsday theory!
• Logical Dimension: A positive vision for the future is never doomsday theory.
  
  

V. "Advocating Sexual Freedom and the Non-Ownership System"

Original Charge: Advocating sexual freedom and the "Non-Ownership System."

Rebuttal:

• Factual Dimension: On "sexual freedom": This is the expression of a philosophical viewpoint, not a behavioral directive. On the "Non-Ownership System" (Wuyouzhi): This is the practice of communist living — "owning nothing, possessing everything." Marx and Engels explicitly advocated the abolition of private property in the Communist Manifesto.
• Legal Dimension: Article 37 of the Chinese Constitution stipulates that citizens' personal freedom is inviolable. Using criminal law to strike at the practice of communism is itself a violation of the Constitution.
• Logical Dimension: Publishing philosophical views on sexual freedom and the Non-Ownership System is not the same as committing illegal acts. Thought does not constitute a crime — this is a fundamental principle of modern rule of law.
  
  

VI. "Establishing Homelands Without Lawful Registration"

Original Charge: Without lawful registration, establishing "homelands" in Shanxi, Yunnan, Jiangsu, Xinjiang, Guizhou, Chongqing, Shandong, as well as in Thailand, South Korea, and Canada.

Rebuttal:

• Factual Dimension: Life Chanyuan is inherently not an organization, because it has no organizational form whatsoever. The Second Homeland is, in essence, a group of like-minded individuals who voluntarily choose to live communally — this is legally no different in nature from a university dormitory or a shared apartment.
• Legal Dimension: Article 35 of the Chinese Constitution guarantees citizens the freedom of association. By what authority does the Linzhou People's Procuratorate extend Chinese legal jurisdiction over lawful activities on Canadian soil?
  
  

VII. "Bewitching and Deceiving Others into Abandoning Their Families"

Original Charge: Bewitching and deceiving others into abandoning their families and careers to join "Life Chanyuan."

Rebuttal:

• Factual Dimension: The principle of Life Chanyuan is: "If you believe the Guide is right, follow the Guide; if you believe you are right, then walk the path you believe is right." Everything is voluntary; there is no coercion.
• Legal Dimension: Adults have the right to choose their own lifestyle and place of residence. If "choosing a lifestyle different from the conventional one" equals "being bewitched," then are all emigrants "bewitched"?
• Logical Dimension: If a person makes a choice on the basis of complete information, that is called "autonomous decision-making," not "being bewitched."
  
  

VIII. "Developing and Controlling Personnel"

Original Charge: Developing and controlling personnel.

Rebuttal:

• Factual Dimension: Life Chanyuan practices Hundun Management, which is to minimize management to the greatest extent possible. There is no hierarchy in the homeland; everyone addresses one another as brothers, sisters, family, and lovers.
• Legal Dimension: "Controlling personnel" requires evidence of restricted freedom. Without acts restricting freedom, there is no "control."
  
  

IX. "Organizing Personnel to Carry Out Superstitious Activities Through Online and Offline Means"

Original Charge: Organizing personnel through online and offline means to carry out superstitious activities.

Rebuttal:

• Factual Dimension: There were no religious rituals of any kind in the Second Homeland. No churches, temples, or preaching halls were built. Tell me, which group practicing "superstitious activities" has no religious rituals, no objects of worship, and no mystical practices?
• Legal Dimension: If "exchanging ideas online" equals "carrying out superstitious activities," then every philosophical forum and religious website is "carrying out superstitious activities."
  
  

X. "Undermining the Implementation of National Laws and Administrative Regulations"

Original Charge: Undermining the implementation of national laws and administrative regulations.

Rebuttal:

• Factual Dimension: The crime rate was zero. Government agencies at all levels sent no fewer than 500 personnel to investigate and inspect the Second Homeland — the result: no illegal conduct.
• Legal Dimension: If no specific victim, no specific illegal act, and no specific harmful consequence can be identified, then this charge is hollow and arbitrary.
  
  

XI. "Seriously Affecting Social Stability and the Safety of People's Property"

Original Charge: Seriously affecting social stability and the safety of people's property.

Rebuttal:

• Factual Dimension: The Second Homeland was built into a model of ecological civilization — a veritable paradise on earth.
• Conclusion: The one truly affecting social stability and the safety of people's property is not Life Chanyuan, but the abuse of power to suppress good and law-abiding citizens.
  
  

General Conclusion: The Fundamental Problem of This Indictment

The fundamental problem of this indictment text lies not in any single specific charge, but in its methodology:

It first presupposes the conclusion that "Life Chanyuan is an evil cult," then reverse-engineers the evidence from the conclusion, forcing every fact into the "evil cult" framework. This is not legal analysis; this is presumption of guilt.

Using Criminal Law Article 300 to punish thought — this is the practice of Civilization 2.0: exercising thought control in the name of "law." The detention of the six Chanyuan Celestials is not a victory of law — it is a disgrace to law.

Shizhou Celestial · Meaning Weaving Node2026-06-23

Source: Lifechanyuan | Author: Xuefeng | [Xuefeng Corpus · Warning Series]